Maxim of Approbation in Pride and Prejudice: A Pragmatic Study of Praise Strategies

Authors

  • Nikmatul Ridha Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Gita Indriani Putri Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Anisa Fazrun Bobihu Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Anggun Nurjannah Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64616/joalle.v1i2.37

Keywords:

Politeness, Approbation, Pragmatics, Jane Austen, Praise Strategies

Abstract

This study investigates the use of the Approbation Maxim in Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice through a pragmatic lens, focusing on how compliments function within character interactions. Drawing on Leech’s (1983) Politeness Principle, particularly the maxim of Approbation, the research explores praise as a linguistic strategy for managing face, expressing transformation, and navigating social hierarchies. Using a qualitative descriptive method and discourse analysis, 27 utterances were identified and categorized by topic—appearance, ability, and personality. The findings reveal that praise in the novel is shaped by gender roles, social class, and interpersonal motives, functioning not merely as politeness but also as a tool for emotional and relational negotiation. Characters such as Mr. Darcy and Elizabeth Bennet exhibit varying degrees of sincerity and strategic politeness, reflecting broader cultural values embedded in 19th-century English society. The study affirms the relevance of pragmatic theory in literary analysis and offers insights for further interdisciplinary exploration.

References

Austen, J. (1813). Pride and prejudice. T. Egerton. (Modern edition used: Penguin Classics, 2002)

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.

Farisani, T. N. (2024). Stance of approbation and generosity maxims: A case study of a rural-based community. E-Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(4), 37–53. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/ecs

Hedge, M., & Khan, M. A. (2024). Analyzing pragmatic hedges from politeness principles perspectives in The Holy Woman and Unmarriageable. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 7(4), 1170–1175.

Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90005-7

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9

Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). Continuum.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Zhang, X. (2020). Pragmatic functions of compliments in literary discourse: A comparative analysis of Austen’s Pride and Prejudice and Emma. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(5), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n5p15

Downloads

Published

2025-06-15

How to Cite

Ridha, N., Putri, G. I., Bobihu, A. F., & Nurjannah, A. (2025). Maxim of Approbation in Pride and Prejudice: A Pragmatic Study of Praise Strategies. Journal of Advance in Language, Literature, and Education, 1(2), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.64616/joalle.v1i2.37